Quote from: Serious

It should be described as almost totally fictitious and visually overdone which I doubt they would ever do. Their aim is to get bums on seats to watch the thing, not be factually accurate in any way.

Should we be overdoing historical events in this way? Only providing that its obvious that it is a fictitious rendering. It should be made clear and obvious that this is the case, otherwise idiots believe it, like the Davinci code rot.

It was described as based on Frank Millers graphic novel 300. It was not at any point billed as a factual and accurate rendition of events at Thermopylae.

So there  :mrgreen:

They said it very quietly

Brillint !!

Its the best last stand ever,
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_stand

Quote from: Clockd 0Ne

I already pointed out its based on the graphic novel too Nos, it seems to have falled on deaf ears :mrgreen:

Oops  :whoops:

I meant Serious more specifically  

I enjoyed it, i wanted the movie to keep going!  

I would call it part-fantasy.....

When me and walrus went, I must say I did enjoy the film but I was more impressed with the quality, a lot better then the lass few films I seen in terms of screen and projector quality, looked very sharp.

^^^^

Why can I see more parodies for the next year or two.?    

ace film. best evar!

im just going for a walk with my personal bodyguard of the best 300 spartans in the world...