yeah.... but have you tried it ?
everyone saud the same thing about 4 vs 8 a few years ago.... and they were wrong... it made a massive difference !
As far as I have seen there is no proof of that and a great deal to show it wasn't true at the time, for most it isn't true now either.
It wouldn't make any difference at all to anyone who used a 32 bit OS, they just would not see it. Then most people don't use enough programs simultaneously to use 2GB of actual memory. I've run Lord of the Rings Online and Guild Wars at the same time as Firefox and a few other bits and pieces, that didn't even hit the swap file.
Even worse it takes time to search the memory to see if the stuff has been loaded, which can slow your computer down if it then has to go and load from the HD.
So you have to be using a 64 bit OS to see any difference and loading a lot of stuff into memory.
Where it does benefit is if you are using so many programs simultaneously that it's always ending up visiting the HD, even then it depends on if it's using the swap files or accessing actual program data. If the first then extra memory would help, if the second you would be better off considering one or more SSDs first.
Either of which should put you in the top 1% of users