Of course the charges are ridiculous, but they are lawful.
maybe in your opinion. but lots and lots of proper lawyers (no offence) wouldnt be challenging this if they were legal. the banks themselves wouldnt have paid out already if they could justify those charges.
Matt
No not in my opinion, in the opinion of the highest court of the land. Hence the ruling we are discussing.
and again, you prove you havent even read anything about it.
the court chucked it out because they deemed to OFT to be challenging the legality under the wrong clause of the law.
nothing to do with the legalityof the charges.
sam, if you want some links to read up on this issue, pm me.