Blair would have done it without evidence of WMD

Serious · December 12, 2009, 18:46:26 PM

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/12/tony-blair-iraq-chilcot-inquiry

Without the evidence there was no legal reason to go into Iraq.

Anyone think he deserves a war trial at the Hague for terrorisim?

bear · December 12, 2009, 18:52:44 PM

Perhaps but could he have pushed for the war without ?

zpyder · December 12, 2009, 19:19:59 PM

What about the whole Saddam Hussain thing?

Since when has going to war required a legal reason come to think of it? :|

knighty · December 12, 2009, 23:45:56 PM

Quote from: zpyderSince when has going to war required a legal reason come to think of it? :|

exactly, its the winners who write the law..... and the history !

Rivkid · December 14, 2009, 12:32:38 PM

We needed to remove a maniac - we did. End of.

News: