Print Page - Blair would have done it without evidence of WMD

Title: Blair would have done it without evidence of WMD
Post by: Serious on December 12, 2009, 18:46:26 PM

http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2009/dec/12/tony-blair-iraq-chilcot-inquiry

Without the evidence there was no legal reason to go into Iraq.

Anyone think he deserves a war trial at the Hague for terrorisim?

Title: Blair would have done it without evidence of WMD
Post by: bear on December 12, 2009, 18:52:44 PM

Perhaps but could he have pushed for the war without ?

Title: Re:Blair would have done it without evidence of WMD
Post by: zpyder on December 12, 2009, 19:19:59 PM

What about the whole Saddam Hussain thing?

Since when has going to war required a legal reason come to think of it? :|

Title: Re:Blair would have done it without evidence of WMD
Post by: knighty on December 12, 2009, 23:45:56 PM

Quote from: zpyderSince when has going to war required a legal reason come to think of it? :|

exactly, its the winners who write the law..... and the history !

Title: Re:Blair would have done it without evidence of WMD
Post by: Rivkid on December 14, 2009, 12:32:38 PM

We needed to remove a maniac - we did. End of.

Tekforums

Chat => General Discussion => Topic started by: Serious on December 12, 2009, 18:46:26 PM