News:

Tekforums.net - The improved home of Tekforums! :D

Main Menu

Rights Vs Privilege

Started by Serious, July 25, 2007, 12:42:07 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Serious

There is a difference. What about drivers and smokers?

Is it a right to drive?
Do smokers have a right to light up?
Government benefits are described as a right, but are they really a privilege?

Anything else you can think of to add to the list?

neXus

Well smokers have a right to light up and kill themselves if they so wish, but proven to harm others in passive smoking and they should not be allowed to basically harm others, so it is there right in that sense but not their right to harm others of course ^^

As for driving, if you want to you should but to be safe and comply with law you got to pass your test and have issuance etc, which is fine isnt it? Making sure you can drive well not just for your sake but again for the safety and security of others

For me it revolves around the effect on others

Eggtastico

Quote from: neXusWell smokers have a right to light up and kill themselves if they so wish, but proven to harm others in passive smoking and they should not be allowed to basically harm others, so it is there right in that sense but not their right to harm others of course ^^


Proven is it? show we some concreate evidence then.
You would breathe in thousands of more nasties walking to the pub than you would spending a night in a smoke filled boozer.

Anyway, I bet drinking has ruined more lives than a little passive smoking.

Pete

The smoking thing is getting old.
I know sh*ts bad right now with all that starving bullsh*t and the dust storms and we are running out of french fries and burrito coverings.

Dave

Quote from: SeriousIs it a right to drive?
Do smokers have a right to light up?
Government benefits are described as a right, but are they really a privilege?

driving = priviledge

smoking = right, I guess in so much as you have the right to do what you want within the law - so obviously cant smoke in the workplace

Benifits = bit of both tbh... if someone has been contributing taxes and NI contributions all their life & then claims state pension/child benifit/disability/incapacity/or even jobseekers (for short periods of time) etc.. then it is sort of their right as theyve contributed

for others however - i.e. long term unemployed whove never worked and are just lazy it is a priveledge tbh.. and ought to be slowly reduced over time and replaced with food/clothing vouchers and compulsory training courses if they are fit and healthy and still cant get a job.

Beaker

Quote from: neXusWell smokers have a right to light up and kill themselves if they so wish, but proven to harm others in passive smoking and they should not be allowed to basically harm others, so it is there right in that sense but not their right to harm others of course ^^

As for driving, if you want to you should but to be safe and comply with law you got to pass your test and have issuance etc, which is fine isnt it? Making sure you can drive well not just for your sake but again for the safety and security of others

For me it revolves around the effect on others

well consider the fact you can accidentally kill someone directly with a car, and that cars chuck out nasties that are harmful to health.  Your line of thought means that cars should also be banned.   ;)

SwissToni

you have the right to do anything in private, in your own space and land.

however its a privilege to do anything in public around others.

simple!

neXus

Quote from: Beaker
Quote from: neXusWell smokers have a right to light up and kill themselves if they so wish, but proven to harm others in passive smoking and they should not be allowed to basically harm others, so it is there right in that sense but not their right to harm others of course ^^

As for driving, if you want to you should but to be safe and comply with law you got to pass your test and have issuance etc, which is fine isnt it? Making sure you can drive well not just for your sake but again for the safety and security of others

For me it revolves around the effect on others

well consider the fact you can accidentally kill someone directly with a car, and that cars chuck out nasties that are harmful to health.  Your line of thought means that cars should also be banned.   ;)

No becuase smoking is not banned, it is banned from public enclosed spaces so there is a difference