Pampering?
LOL. Your idea of todays women sounds like its stuck in the 40s ![Tongue :p](https://www.tekforums.net/Smileys/teksmileys/tongue.gif)
I suspect you would be supprised at the number of women who still do it then. Oh and do you really think relationships and human nature have changed that much?
M3ta7h3ad. Your analogy is one sided, I have seen plenty of womed who would rate as dogs on it and lots of men who would be cats. It depends on how vulnerable they are.
My point being that a woman who runs around after a bloke, prepares all his meals, does the shopping, washing and all the rest of the household chores is going to be taken for granted. Secondly if a woman treats a bloke like that then its probable he isnt going to change so if she goes out t work then hes still not going to do any housework.
Anyone think Im going to have to move this to GD? Its definitely not waffle.
The analogy works as a rule.
What your on about are exceptions to that rule.
Most women are stronger mentally than a bloke from the same background.
men tend to be more dependent on women for "love" where as in general women only stick it out if they can see its worth it.
Take for example the age old "I want to be married", two people love each other the man not caring if they are married or not so hasnt asked. Woman then threatens to leave him because they "arent going anywhere" theres nothing further in it for her, but for the man... hes happy where he is right now.
Men in general are more likely to find "the one" and stay with her.
Women in general wont, theyll always be looking for it, sure they may be in a long-term relationship, but if they find themselves wanting more from it, and you cant supply it. She will start to look elsewhere, she may not act upon it, but you can guarantee shell be thinking about it.
![Smiley :)](https://www.tekforums.net/Smileys/teksmileys/smiley.gif)
As for the shallow thing, I mentioned that mainly because of knighty.
Hes right though, men go for personality traits, women go for looks.