ahh youre right, my bad, hadnt realised there were two versions (not used to having to look for image stabilisers on the lens!)

Well iv ordered the other 2 from various places, slightly more ££ but not massively.

Really looking forward to getting them and seeing what they are like.

Fingers crossed they will be ok.

Quote from: Daveditch the 28-135

get a 17-50 - tis pretty much perfect for a crop sensor

And you have actually used the 28-135? TBVH this is one of the best Canon lenses going. Fits in very well with the 10-24mm Tamron and a 75-300mm.

Using the 150-500mm Sigma theres a slight gap but still a very useable setup.

ooo 50x optical zoom in 3 lenses, I bet thats a sweet setup even if the Bigma is a little on the heavy side

Fedex tracking the sigma, still in Hong Kong at the moment..

Not sure what the other 2 are up to, will have to just wait and see i think.

^ Most stuff Ive ordered from China arrives faster than if Id ordered from the UK!    8-)

Quote from: Serious

Quote from: Daveditch the 28-135

get a 17-50 - tis pretty much perfect for a crop sensor

And you have actually used the 28-135? TBVH this is one of the best Canon lenses going. Fits in very well with the 10-24mm Tamron and a 75-300mm.

Using the 150-500mm Sigma theres a slight gap but still a very useable setup.

Nope - have you used the 17-50?

The 28-135 might be sharp but tbh.. isnt wide enough for me on a crop and Id prefer the larger aperture across the range - added to that the tamron is very very sharp - essentially he could get the tamron and the 28-135 would be completely redundant (it already is for most of its focal length anyway since hes already got a better lens to cover 70-200).

Surprisingly, yes I have, my brother has the 17-50.

I still prefer the 10-24 plus 28-135 combo. the extra 7mm on the wide end really makes a difference while the missing 4mm isnt really noticeable.

Im having some real issues sourcing the tamron lenses for a good price at the moment

Quote from: SeriousSurprisingly, yes I have, my brother has the 17-50.

I still prefer the 10-24 plus 28-135 combo. the extra 7mm on the wide end really makes a difference while the missing 4mm isnt really noticeable.

fair enough - tis personal preference I guess

though youre likely in a minority - 24-70 and 70-200 are popular combinations on full frame (1D, 5D)

the 17-50 f2.8 from sigma and tamron and 17-55 f2.8 from canon have effectively been made as a (rough) equivalent and indeed the 50-150 f2.8 lenses - though tbh.. you might as well use a 70-200

I think Id be changing lenses too often with 10-24 and 28-135

given that binary has already got a 70-200 then ditching the 28-135 is a bit of a no-brainer IMO

For most normal use the 28-135 is a very good lens. The only real reason to switch down is when you absolutely cannot step back to get everything in or you want wide angle nature/construction shots. Similarly the only reason to switch up is if you have a subject that is difficult to get close enough to. You wouldnt normally use the 150-500 for cityscapes or landscapes while you wouldnt use the 10-24 for wildlife photography.

Unless something completely unexpected turns up I hardly switch lenses at all.