News:

Tekforums.net - The improved home of Tekforums! :D

Main Menu

Lens recommendation

Started by zpyder, December 26, 2010, 11:53:54 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

zpyder

I am thinking I need to replace my 17-85mm EF-S lens. I knew when I bought it that it suffers from vignetting at the wide end (~17-25mm) but is otherwise a good lens.

However I think Id rather get a lens without this issue, and maybe a little more range. Any suggestions? Budget wise Ill need to sell the 17-85mm (Im hoping maybe £200) and my Sigma 70-300mm sh*tty lens that hasnt been used at all since the summer, which might be £75, So budget is maybe ~£350 new or second hand.

Serious

Ive got 10-24mm Tamron, 28-135 Canon, and the 150-500mm Sigma, these make my best set and you wont do that much better elsewhere.

I also have a 70-300mm Canon, cheap, with fairly limited facilities. Reason I keep this is simply that it is far lighter and easier to carry than the Sigma.

zpyder

The 28-135 is the one I was debating over mostly, it was that or the 17-85mm. Ended up with the 17 on the assumption that if Im going to the lakes for landscape stuff wider is better, though 17-28 has bad vignetting. Id read that the 28-135 has it too though?

zpyder

Example of the vignetting at the wide end:


Grandma at xmas by Chris_Moody, on Flickr

Serious

I use mine on a small sensor camera, it doesnt have any vignetting on that, My brother has the 5D and his pictures seem OK with it too.

To test take your camera into a shop and ask them if you can try one out on it?

Mongoose

most zooms will vignette at their widest setting, particularly at large apertures. If youre going to be using ~17mm a lot and want to avoid this, something like Serious 10-24 might be a good option as you wont be pushing the extremes of what it can do.

Eggtastico

how is your sigma 70-300 sh*tty?
I bought the tamron version in Jessops sale.
Bought it to replace my canon 70-210 which is supposedly be a better lense, but I cant get good results with it.
I should get more for the canon than the tamron cost me..

I look at these
http://photography-on-the.net/forum/showthread.php?t=321565
My canon gets nowhere near them results.


zpyder

The sigma is very very soft, and slow. That is how it is sh*tty.

I think they actually released a slightly newer (and better version), mine is the older one. But you cant expect much from a lens with that much range for that price.