Tekforums.net - The improved home of Tekforums!
In HD the Xboxs always seemed jittery and pixelated, not to mention it
Graphics: The XBOX 360 is a clear winner. The GPU is more powerful. It has more powerful fillrate, and far more pixel and vertex processing horsepower. Part of the reason is their choice of memory, and architecture of pixel and vertex procesing. I can’t get into details but the same vertex shader will run much slower on the PS3 than the XBOX 360. The 360 also has a clever new way rendering high definition anti aliased back buffers. To accomplish the same effect on PS3 is prohibitively expensive. For this reason I think many games will have no choice but to run in non-HD resolutions on the PS3 version, use a lower quality anti aliasing technique, or do back buffer upscaling. The end result in all cases is going to be noticeably worse image quality.
Its true what SteveF says, for the time being the PS3 is probably the best Blu player in terms of price, quality, compatibility and updatability. Lots of people are getting them in from America to take advantage of US releases and region coding.
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.