Author Topic: Revision Waffle: Habitat Management and Wildlife Behaviour  (Read 630 times)

  • Offline zpyder

  • Posts: 6,946
  • Hero Member
Just trying something new this year. Rather than do a pseudo answer to various potential exam questions in word, I figured I could do them here in waffle. Some of you might find the info interesting, others might not (But hey, youre not being forced to read it!). I figure that writing the answers with the knowledge that they might be read by other people, might help focus them :shrug:

These are mental-splurges, no googling or cribbing involved heh. Exams are 3 hours long and have to answer 3 of 6 questions. So each chunk below, I have to write in an hour really... Feel free to comment or criticise the info, but remember this isnt my attempt at writing an exam answer, but rather my attempt at structuring as much info as I can on each subject in a quick manner (I figure 30-40 mins typing will be about an hours handwriting for me:( )

Habitat Restoration
Heathlands
Heathlands are important habitats, containing high numbers of rare and endemic species of flora and fauna. The amount of heathland in europe has declined severely in recent decades as a result of development and agriculture, with the remaining heathland (~1% of the land cover from 1900s) in fragments.

Fragmented habitats are a cause for concern due to possible detrimental effects of "island ecosystems". Such factors include conflicts between territorial animals, reduced food availability and breeding capacity through effects such as the Allee effect (Too few individuals in a habitat make it impossible for them to locate each other & breed).

Increasing awareness of this habitat decline has resulted in the remaining heathland gaining protected status. Efforts are now under way to conserve, manage, improve, restore and increasing the remaining heathland cover in Europe.

Much study has been undertaken into the conversion of ex-arable land to heathland. A key reason being that a large amount of arable land was in turn converted from heathland, and so some heath species may remain in the seedbank. However, core problems arise in this principle, these being that heathland requires low nutrients and pH, whilst arable land is nutrient loaded and high pH.

Because of this, several methods have been trialled in reducing pH and nutrient content of arable land. Additionally, it is hoped that by lowering the pH and nutrient status of the soil, ruderal arable flora will die or decline. As heather species (Calluna vulgaris Erica tetralix) requires low vegetation cover or bare ground to colonise, this is ideal.

Methods include:

Application of Elemental sulphur
Application of bracken and pine chippings
Soil stripping

Elemental sulphur is able to significantly reduce the pH and nutrient status of of soils. However, it is expensive and can have inconsistent results from uneven application. Issues also arise with the potential for run-off into nearby water systems. Natural alternatives such as pine chippings and bracken are able to lower the pH and nutrient status, but not significantly enough to aid in heathland restoration. However, research has found that a combination of Sulphur and bracken litter may lower costs, and provide more consistent results.

Soil stripping is effective at reducing pH and nutrient loading, as well as removing a significant portion of the remaining arable seedbank, which may outcompete heathland propagules, many of which are poor competitors. However issues arise with cost, and what to do with the removed top soil, which would contain high nutrients and a significant seedbank of weed species. Removal of topsoil may also facilitate erosion.

After successfully converting the soil properties to a condition suitable for heathland colonisation, careful management is required to ensure that ruderal species such as graminoids (Ie Agrostis spp., festuca ovina) from the persistent arable seedbank do not recolonise. A careful mowing or grazing program may be beneficial at maintaining the required levels of bare ground and soil disturbance.

Several options are available for restocking of the converted heathland. These include the use of whole turves or fragments of existing heathland. These methods are suitable only as a last resort, as they result in the destruction of heathland. However, with careful implementation, the ratio of heathland lost to new heathland may be 1:5 with heathland fragments (1:1 in the case of whole turves).

A more suitable alternative is the seeding of the area with heather brash. Carefully harvested on rotation, this method has minimal impact on existing heathland, whilst seeding new land. Care should be taken in all instances to ensure suitable propagule provenance.

It is important to note that an alternative to the conversion of ex-arable land is the conversion of conifer plantations. The plantations often have low amenity value and low diversity, due to their managed nature. The trees also aid in converting the soil to a pH similar to natural heathland. Additionally, older plantations may have a significantly reduced weed seedbank. As such, the cost of conversion is minimal and is a viable alternative to ex-arable land. Additionally a program may be set up to convert plantation to heathland, and ex-arable land to plantation, which may be easier. This in turn provides a long term program for the restoration of heathland, and the ability to recoup some costs through harvested lumber.

Grasslands

Woodlands

  • Offline Pete

  • Posts: 5,155
  • Hero Member
Re:Revision Waffle: Habitat Management and Wildlife Behaviour
Reply #1 on: May 11, 2008, 12:02:50 PM
Good stuff, Im not gonna crit that cos its just waffle.

I was srlsy thinking about doing an ou degree in env. science next year, but one of my ex-girlies said it was a stupid idea :/
I know sh*ts bad right now with all that starving bullsh*t and the dust storms and we are running out of french fries and burrito coverings.

  • Offline zpyder

  • Posts: 6,946
  • Hero Member
Re:Revision Waffle: Habitat Management and Wildlife Behaviour
Reply #2 on: May 11, 2008, 12:29:21 PM
Heh, cool. You should give it a thought, gonna be a fair few jobs opening up in environmental science over the coming years, marine stuff with the Marine Bill coming out, and terrestrial stuff with just an increased awareness in conservation and sustainability :)

Im trying to figure out how many pages the above would span. The exam sheets have weird margins, but I figure Im short by maybe 10 mins or so/half a page :(

I missed quite a lot of stuff out from my notes it seems, on heathlands. Though its more general heathland info...

  • Offline zpyder

  • Posts: 6,946
  • Hero Member
Re:Revision Waffle: Habitat Management and Wildlife Behaviour
Reply #3 on: May 11, 2008, 13:42:51 PM
Ecological value of farmland Factors (Organic farming)

Modernisation of agricultural practices has lead to an intensification of agriculture on the land. This has resulted in a decline in biodiversity and species abundance in much of the UK countryside. To combat this, the government and NGOs are increasingly supporting "organic farming" practices, which go further than the assumption that the produce is GMO free, but also produced in an environmentally friendly way.

Before exploring the methods and tools available for farmers seeking an organic solution, the pressures and issues that organic farming tackles must be addressed.

The core of the problem lies with overuse or misuse of chemicals, and overstocking of land with cattle.

Chemical use can be broken down into pesticides (herbi/insecti/fungicides) and fertilisers.

Pesticides are responsible for a large decline in biodiversity, both directly and indirectly. Originally, many pesticides were created using organochlorines, which persist in the habitat and can accumulate trophically. Modern pesticides are based off organophosphates, which are less likely to accumulate trophically (though still have associated risks) or natural chemicals, such as pyrethins, which are bassed of a chemical found in Crysanthemums. Herbicides generally target broad leaved ruderal species, reducing the diversity of flora in a field. This in turn reduces the diversity and abundance of invertebrates, which are important food sources for many birds. The grey partridge (Perdix perdix) has particularly been affected from a combination of factors, which will be discussed later. Foliar applications of herbicides also impact wildlife indirectly through the ingestion and accumulation of toxic compounds.

Insecticides directly impact the invertebrate diversity/abundance, and as a result any invertebrate feeding fauna (both by lack of food and by ingesting contaminated prey). Fungicides additionally may contain insecticidal properties. A basic solution to pesticide propblems is to apply the pesticides to seeds, and then drill the seeds into the soil to avoid the risk of grain-feeding birds from ingesting the treated seed stock.

Chemical fertilisers are also responsible for the nutrient loading of agricultural land. Additionally, as with pesticides, there is the risk of run-off into water systems, which would cause eutrophication and toxic effects. The use of slurry is now known to result in the accumulation of toxic elements, such as Cd, which is xenobiotic and may bioaccumulate in flora and fauna. Additionally slurry is toxic to earthworms. This as a result reduces the value of arable, nutrient enriched fields, as an invertebrate food source for many birds such as the black bird.

Another practice that has impacted wildlife include the change from spring sown crops to winter sown crops. As a result, stubble in fields was lost, which provides a vital food source for wood pidgeons, pheasant, and grey partridge. The advent of combine harvesters additionally removed more food by being more efficient at harvesting grain, with less waste grain available to the birds. Silage bales further prevented access to vital grain for these animals.

Organic solutions
The aim of organic farming practices is to help reduce the impact of agricultural practices on biodiversity. The range of techniques and tools cover all farming areas. Many techniques result in a slight loss of crop yield (5-10%), however due to the labelling/certification system, this loss of yield can be compensated through increased prices. Additionally, farmers have available to them a range of bursaries and grants for following specific organic farming best practice guides.

A driver of organic farming is in the decline of many farmland bird species, such as the grey partridge, pheasant, stone curlew etc. These species have declined as a result of the change in agricultural practices mentioned above. As a result, many organic techniques are aimed at increasing the population numbers of these birds. This can be achieved by providing food and shelter for the birds, by improving hedgerows and creating conservation headlands.

hedgerows can be improved by more careful management. Current practices find many hedgerows cut too often and at a uniform, low height. Ideally they should be cut no lower than 2m, and not when the hedges are in fruit (as the berries provide a vital source of food). However hedges should not be left unmanaged for too long, as otherwise they may become gappy. Hedges provide important corridors for many species, such as the dormouse and foxes.

Conservation headlands are areas of ground that runs between a hedgerow and the crop boundary. They perform the role of a buffer, where a mixed seed is sown. The width of the headland is required to be wide enough to prevent weed species from entering the crops, but not so wide as to severely reduce crop area. The mixed seed should contain a range of ruderal species, providing a food source for invertebrates and game. Careful management by cutting, should be undertaken, but not during nesting season.

Beetle banks are another important tool in organic farming. They are small strips of land planted with tussocky graminoids. They provide a food source for game as well as a refuge for important invertebrates. Both conservation headlands and beetlebanks are populated insectivorous invertebrates, which aid in pest control. beetle banks are also low cost, with a 400m long strip (Suitable for a field of 20ha) costing less than £80 to create, and <£30 a year in maintenance. Similarly to the CH, buffer areas of crops may be sown around the beetlebank to help prevent the spread of ruderal species into the crops.

Additional tools for replacing herbicides are undersowing and intersowing of crops. Intersowing combines two or more crop types. They may both be harvested, or the secondary crop can be used as a mulch. The objective is to either reduce the bare soil area to prevent the germination of weed species, or to use a crop as a preferential decoy for pest species, avoiding damage to the more valuable crop.

Undersowing uses a similar principal, where a low lying ruderal species is sown between crops. Often clover (trifolium spp.) is used, as it also provides soil nutrient fixing properties (N, P).

Farmland ponds are also important habitats for amphians such as the common frog and crested newt. They also provide a habitat wading birds.

Generally, organic farming practices increase alpha and beta diversity by reversing the homogenising impact of intensive farming. Increased heterogeniety in habitats, with bare patches of soil and uncropped areas, increase species richness. Vegetation is often first to recover, due to persistent seed banks. Fauna takes longer, and may require a larger proportion of farms to adopt organic practices before an increase in population numbers occurs (Due to fragmented habitats).

  • Offline zpyder

  • Posts: 6,946
  • Hero Member
Re:Revision Waffle: Habitat Management and Wildlife Behaviour
Reply #4 on: May 12, 2008, 13:32:47 PM
Slightly gutted, faming/organic farming didnt come up in the exam. It should have been a given due to it being in the last 3 years exams, and us going on a field trip to an organic farm, and the lecturer pointing out they dont take us on field trips for nothing. Oh well :(

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.