Having watched parts of some of the weird hearings there clearly is evidence and there clearly was fraud (as there is at any human ran election) However they seem to keep claiming there's bigger and better evidence, all this "unleash the kraken" Rhetoric so far has been just talk.
What did grab my attention yesterday, and the only reason I'm posting on the thread again really, was this https://twitter.com/PatrickByrne/status/1334220338679476228 I've followed Patrick for many years now and respect his work on Bitcoin & Blockchain tech and his work against naked short selling on wall street (First saw him on Keiser report ages ago) The video makes interesting viewing, everything he says is PLAUSIBLE, again though, we're yet to see anything
Not actually quite right.
- There are always mistakes and errors within every election. They have identified those cases and the most votes in any situation has been I think 129 and nothing more.
- The affidavit stuff: 99% of them come from a process where they sent out emails to supporters and asked if they saw any fraud to go to a link and fill in a web form. It had the legal statements and apparently reCaptcha (which apparently helps for a digital thing have the bare minimum vetting level to have it classes as a one)
- They supposedly vetted a lot of these but even those removed were accidentally submitted into more than one of their court cases.
- Some of the ones submitted instantly questioned by judges - all without proof but many who claim to be for the same region/state contradict each other. This is the biggest thing. Out of 100's of these things for one poll centre for example all but 3 were not even anywhere near. A lot of the submissions came from the Trump supports who went to poll centres trying to be observers themselves claiming they could not see or saw dodgy stuff!
- The other thing is they have shown off and have people shown up at their fake hearings and kangaroo courts (not real) and thus not sworn in in any way allowing them to make their wild claims. They have yet in court had any witness sworn in under oaf or submitted their full
affidavit and claims because that would mean those people would be liable as well as them - They basically know its trash.[/size][/size]- In most of their actions as well they have had to admit in front of a judge that they are NOT claiming Fraud either, because again in court and in the actual legal real world they can not make the claims.[/size][/size][/size]In terms of those claims:[/size][/size]They have basically claimed everything and anything at this point. As one thing fails they have gone and tried something else.[/size]This guy has basically covered it all:https://www.youtube.com/user/briantylercohenBasically shows how despite what is said, in the courts etc there is nothing.There are actually big flaws in a lot of their claims.
- Machines switching votes in states where machines were not actually used
- Machines switching but the fact they print the ballets and those have been recounted and show no disparity is ignored
- The two companies they mentioned that are owned by the same people and thus in cahoots with the big list of all the conspiracy groups including someone who has been dead for years!! Are actually RIVAL companies and NOT related.
I can go on but been following this a lot in fascination at the claims vs reality and just how fantastical it has become and how they are allowed to do this. Laws, policies and more will change as a result to prevent this in the future.