Author Topic: Film SLR  (Read 4244 times)

  • Offline jamieL

  • Posts: 641
  • Hero Member
Film SLR
on: March 08, 2007, 22:04:52 PM
http://cgi.ebay.co.uk/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=300088594310&ssPageName=STRK:MEWN:IT&ih=020



Just bought that off Ebay. Looks a great deal! Ive never owned or used a film SLR before and Ive only used a dSLR briefly once.

Any points for SLR or more specifically film SLR cameras? Anything I should know or some good read? :)

Film SLR
Reply #1 on: March 08, 2007, 22:10:46 PM
Heh, Ive got a classic OM1. Brilliant cameras. Problem lays in the batteries they use. AFAIK, theyre not available here any more. Might be different with the OM10. If you cant get the battery, then run it in manual mode with a light meter. 8) Totally old skool. Ive got a sweet Sekonic classic.

  • Offline jamieL

  • Posts: 641
  • Hero Member
Re:Film SLR
Reply #2 on: March 08, 2007, 22:30:51 PM
It says it takes either:

"two 1.5V alkaline-manganese batteries
LR44 (A76)."

"Two 1.5V silver oxide batteries SR44 (Eveready
EPX-76) or equivalents can be also used."


on the online PDF Manual for it.

Are those not just the kind of batteries you find in watches? If so, there are plenty of market stalls in town that sell these.

And if not, couldnt I find some online or something? :)

Film SLR
Reply #3 on: March 08, 2007, 22:45:34 PM
Youre good then. Ive got the older one that takes a 625 mercury button battery. I can use the silver ones but exposure is a little off, and the alkalines are worthless.

  • Offline jamieL

  • Posts: 641
  • Hero Member
Re:Film SLR
Reply #4 on: March 08, 2007, 22:54:32 PM
Ahhh good :)


Wheres best for developing? Is it much extra to get them stuck on a cd aswell? Im getting into band photography so having them in digital format aswell as prints would be best.

Film SLR
Reply #5 on: March 08, 2007, 23:05:04 PM
TBH, good scans are quite expensive and done on drums. I used to work at the print lab in Chicago where we did traditional silver processing and even some hand made papers and toning, then drum scanned into a computer. It was a PITA, but with good results.

You can get serviceable scans for cheap, but theyre none too good for actual production. If an image is to be be mass printed, it needs to be drum scanned.

Id just get an DSLR. :lol:

Film SLR
Reply #6 on: March 08, 2007, 23:34:02 PM
iv got a real old 35mm SLR here somewhere, made in the USSR (yes thats what it says on the bottom) I used to have some fun with it but could never get a really sharp shot, probably dirty or needing a service or sommit.

  • Offline Serious

  • Posts: 14,467
  • Global Moderator
  • Hero Member
Film SLR
Reply #7 on: March 08, 2007, 23:38:02 PM
Quote from: jamieL
Ahhh good :)


Wheres best for developing? Is it much extra to get them stuck on a cd aswell? Im getting into band photography so having them in digital format aswell as prints would be best.


Providing you arent going to be publishing and just want snaps then check out the main supermarket chains such as Asda and Tesco. Put in a single film to each and see how they do, then use what you think is the best. It doesnt cost that much to have them put on CD but Id get yourself a flatbed scanner and use that, it should produce adequate results.

Quote from: Binary Shadow
iv got a real old 35mm SLR here somewhere, made in the USSR (yes thats what it says on the bottom) I used to have some fun with it but could never get a really sharp shot, probably dirty or needing a service or sommit.

Chances are its a Zenith. Not the best cameras by a long way.

  • Offline jamieL

  • Posts: 641
  • Hero Member
Re:Film SLR
Reply #8 on: March 09, 2007, 02:24:03 AM
No publishing, just some stuff for a few local bands to use on their website/myspace page and to build up my "portfolio".

I like the idea behind using film :) That you cant just take 20 shots and pick the nicest one on the computer when you get home. You actually have to take the time and use a good eye to get the perfect shot first time.

Should be a good introduction into SLRs too! Ill be getting a Canon EOS 350D around May/June time when I can actually afford one :)

Film SLR
Reply #9 on: March 09, 2007, 02:32:50 AM
Nah, if you want good shots, its just like digital, shoot till your finger falls off. Its just more expensive. I processed a lot of rolls for "pro" fotogs at the Chicago lab, and lemme tell ya--the signal to noise ratio is pretty low, even at the top. :lol:

Film SLR
Reply #10 on: March 09, 2007, 10:05:46 AM
Quote from: Serious
Quote from: Binary Shadow
iv got a real old 35mm SLR here somewhere, made in the USSR (yes thats what it says on the bottom) I used to have some fun with it but could never get a really sharp shot, probably dirty or needing a service or sommit.

Chances are its a Zenith. Not the best cameras by a long way.

Thats the boy.. POS then lol

Film SLR
Reply #11 on: March 09, 2007, 11:18:18 AM
Quote from: Binary Shadow
Quote from: Serious
Quote from: Binary Shadow
iv got a real old 35mm SLR here somewhere, made in the USSR (yes thats what it says on the bottom) I used to have some fun with it but could never get a really sharp shot, probably dirty or needing a service or sommit.

Chances are its a Zenith. Not the best cameras by a long way.

Thats the boy.. POS then lol


Rubbish, the Zenits are a light tight box like any other camera of that era. Some of the Russian lenses are ok, some of them are awful, some are direct copys of Leica and Zeiss designs and are actually quite good. Stick a Japanese Pentax 50mm Takumar lens on that lovely old M42 mount and the only limit is the photographer. Some people (myself included) are using adaptors to put M42 lenses on modern DSLRs simply because the quality of (some of) these old lenses is spectacular.

Film cameras are exactly as good as the lens you put on the front and the film you put in the back, no more, no less. Thereafter its up to you.

As to the OM-10, I think you paid on the high side of a fair price but it should serve you well as an introduction to SLR and a backup body once you get your DSLR. Since you are going Canon you cant use old lenses anyway so it doesnt matter that the OM series is long dead, and will actually make any other accessorys you may want in the meantime cheaper.

Id look at somewhere like Directfoto for developing while you learn, every film you send them they send you a free (but cheap) unexposed one back. Keeps film costs down while you get your head round things and the printing quality isnt bad either.

  • Offline Alien8

  • Posts: 467
  • Sr. Member
Re:Film SLR
Reply #12 on: March 09, 2007, 19:09:34 PM
as above realy I love the M42 lens can get get them for pennys and built like tanks the kit lens on the alpha feels like a toy compared to any of my M42 lens even though the kit lens is worth more than all the M42 ones togeather

OM mount isnt a dead end if you go cannon OM to EOS adapters ;)

Re:Film SLR
Reply #13 on: March 09, 2007, 19:46:09 PM
Quote from: Alien8
as above realy I love the M42 lens can get get them for pennys and built like tanks the kit lens on the alpha feels like a toy compared to any of my M42 lens even though the kit lens is worth more than all the M42 ones togeather

OM mount isnt a dead end if you go cannon OM to EOS adapters ;)


bet the M42s are sharper than the kit lens though, unless Sony/KM have put a lot more effort into their kit lens than anyone else.

No lens in my kit bag can touch my Zeiss MC Flektogon 35mm, which I picked up for next to nothing in a high street charity shop.

Maxi, I forgot to mention earlier, have you looked into getting a Wein cell for that OM-1 of yours? My Dad has the same problem as you with his old Pentax Spotmatic but it runs great (meter correct and everything) on Wein cells.

Film SLR
Reply #14 on: March 10, 2007, 12:27:15 PM
Word of a digital back for 35mm SLRs was also bandied about a few years ago. May have infact moved on further to be an actual viable product now. Have a google.

Still probably extortionately expensive. Digital backs for medium format cameras are insanely so.

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.