Am I alone in thinking that we have no right at all to meddle in another countries affairs?
I think the way we are interfering in Libya is a complete joke.
Why do we think we have right to tell another country how to conduct themselves when ours is as corupt and messed up as the worst of them.
If Gadafi has been seen as a legit ruler by the UN for 40 years and we saw fit to effectivly sell the Lockerby bomber to them for oil, then why now do they all of a sudden think they can help oust him. The rebels are more illegitimate than gadafi, who is to say if the rebels get into power they will start a 'democracy'
I think the ruler of a country has the right to try and fight off 'rebels' without other countries getting involved.
What has been going on in Bahrain is much worse than in Libya.
If you have opposition to the current party in power you go out and protest and that has happened in England many times, and the US. People then vote and choose who they want.
You do not see Labour for example rolling out tanks and planes to bomb people to shut up.
Does not matter about anything else, when you do that to stay in power then things need to be done. To the other countries similar? Well the armed forces have backed down or the diplomatic lines at least are still open.
The latest attacks last night/morning/few days Libya are like "Nah, were not doing anything, huh? were attacking? no, were doing what you say" As Reporters and civilians film these.
You would see more youtube videos but the web is pretty much locked down there.
- Bahrain is strange because it's bad but there is again some level of diplomatic communications.
Syria there is some political communication and things are not on the scale of Libya.
Sudan - No idea there.
It is good to see the people over in the middle east finally really wanting true change, there are many that finally get it and wanting to do something about it. It could very easily turn into a complete f**k up there mind and with the middle east the main source of oil - not good.