Tekforums

Chat => Sports, Hobbies & Motors => Topic started by: Bacon on June 04, 2010, 21:17:17 PM

Title: BP Irony
Post by: Bacon on June 04, 2010, 21:17:17 PM
(http://h.imagehost.org/0764/500x_bp_no_spill_sign.jpg)

http://jalopnik.com/5555628/bp-station-sign-is-beyond-irony
Title: Re:BP Irony
Post by: mr_roll on July 21, 2010, 23:01:14 PM
ha ha
Title: Re:BP Irony
Post by: chrisdicko on July 22, 2010, 11:23:04 AM
Is that 87RON on that pump?!
Title: Re:BP Irony
Post by: soopahfly on July 22, 2010, 12:00:48 PM
Its the pond water the Yanks like to put in their tanks.
Its also why they get exactly 4bhp from a 20litre v8 engine.
Title: Re:BP Irony
Post by: Beaker on July 22, 2010, 12:33:35 PM
Quote from: chrisdickoIs that 87RON on that pump?!

add 4 or 5 to the RON to get a UK-like figure.  The US use a different system of calculating.  Still only 91/92 though, so a bit sh*t for power.
Title: Re:BP Irony
Post by: chrisdicko on July 22, 2010, 23:53:55 PM
lol, didnt realise it was that poor!! My engine would destroy itself on that  :mutley:

soopahfly, makes sense why they get so little power now!!!  :rofl:
Title: Re:BP Irony
Post by: Beaker on July 23, 2010, 07:12:49 AM
Quote from: chrisdickolol, didnt realise it was that poor!! My engine would destroy itself on that  :mutley:

soopahfly, makes sense why they get so little power now!!!  :rofl:

I vaguely remember being told it was to do with higher RON not working at certain heights above sea level.  Considering the fact I can fill up here with standard unleaded, then drive over the Alps without any problems Im guessing they are talking total bollocks :)
Title: BP Irony
Post by: Sam on July 23, 2010, 08:02:46 AM
Yeah its just sh*t gas. I get 15-20mpg in my 2 litre SUV which in the uk youd get 30 on.
Title: BP Irony
Post by: Binary Shadow on July 23, 2010, 09:16:29 AM
different size gallons over there, dont know many if any 2.0 petrol engines that claim 30mpg over here tbh especially in a SUV that wont be aerodynamic at all
Title: BP Irony
Post by: Bacon on July 23, 2010, 13:03:15 PM
Quote from: Binary Shadowdifferent size gallons over there, dont know many if any 2.0 petrol engines that claim 30mpg over here tbh especially in a SUV that wont be aerodynamic at all

Petrol Engines

Audi Q5 = 33MPG
BMW X3 = 30MPG
Citroen C-Crosser = 30-31MPG
Hyundai Tucson = 35MPG
Kia Sorrento = 33MPG
Kia Sportage = 34-35MPG

Heres a few, you can continue on parkers alphabetically :P
Title: BP Irony
Post by: Binary Shadow on July 23, 2010, 13:23:45 PM
seriously though.. in the real world your not likely to see that

edit: surprised to see so many claiming it though, must have made some big efficiency improvements
Title: Re:BP Irony
Post by: zpyder on July 23, 2010, 14:15:48 PM
Arent those figures always "under optimum conditions" though?

My Mazda is meant to get 40mpg, but in reality a fairer figure would likely be 35mpg if driven normally, or in my case 37.5 as I dont find it necessary to floor it all the time.
Title: Re:BP Irony
Post by: Bacon on July 23, 2010, 15:49:28 PM
Surely those figures refer to high gear / motorway / carriageway etc, i would of thought the situation that Sam is in is optimal as its all big ass roads in America
Title: BP Irony
Post by: Sam on July 23, 2010, 16:30:39 PM
The roads in the states are sh*t and its terrible to drive because you have to stop every 100 yards for an intersection.

I have the tucson btw.
Title: Re:BP Irony
Post by: chrisdicko on July 23, 2010, 22:34:12 PM
on 99RON V-Power I get about 16MPG on average.  :rofl: