Tekforums

Chat => Sports, Hobbies & Motors => Topic started by: Dave on July 27, 2006, 22:39:03 PM

Title: Cycling - drugs - nah never
Post by: Dave on July 27, 2006, 22:39:03 PM
Quote from: maximusotter
Quote from: Davecycling is notorious for drugs

anyone who denies that is just sticking thier head in the sand


Prove that any of todays top finishers are getting an edge from illegal performance enhancers, or bugger off.

Typical "Dave" dogmatism without a shred of evidence. Pathetic.

perhaps you spoke too soon maxi

http://news.bbc.co.uk/sport1/hi/other_sports/cycling/5221122.stm
Title: Re:Cycling - drugs - nah never
Post by: brummie on July 27, 2006, 22:47:09 PM
Being digussed here: http://www.tekforums.co.uk/posts/list/3043.page
Title: Cycling - drugs - nah never
Post by: maximusotter on July 27, 2006, 22:54:34 PM
Nothings been proven. High testosterone levels do not indict.

Why did you start another thread? Wouldnt want to clog up the S & H forum when theres already a thread about this. :roll:

Title: Cycling - drugs - nah never
Post by: knighty on July 27, 2006, 23:04:52 PM
^^

QuoteThe Phonak Cycling Team was notified on Wednesday by the UCI of an unusual level of testosterone/epitestosterone ratio in the test made on Floyd Landis after stage 17 of the Tour de France

is not the level of testosterone thats the problem, its the amount in proportion to his levels of epitestosterone
Title: Cycling - drugs - nah never
Post by: Dave on July 28, 2006, 06:58:00 AM
Quote from: maximusotterNothings been proven. High testosterone levels do not indict.

head, sand, in......

nah - me thinks it is fairly dodgy at best tbh...