Tekforums

Chat => Sports, Hobbies & Motors => Topic started by: Pete on April 21, 2006, 19:28:08 PM

Title: Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Pete on April 21, 2006, 19:28:08 PM
I just got this car last week, I spent Ã,£55 on a new battery for it and now today the driver side suspension has collapsed, front and back. The other side is fine;

(http://www.palmer934.plus.com/rover100.jpg)

Is that going to be expensive to fix? Is it hydrolastic?
 :x  
Yes, the bumper is loose too   :cry:
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Beaker on April 21, 2006, 19:28:47 PM
probably gas filled.  Local rover specialist should sort it
Title: Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: knighty on April 21, 2006, 20:20:56 PM
its odd that its front and back, it thought it had springs :o
Title: Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: brummie on April 21, 2006, 20:26:42 PM
Quote from: knightyits odd that its front and back, it thought it had springs :o

nah

sided hydrolatics
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Pete on April 21, 2006, 20:39:11 PM
bah, just been reading up;

Hydra sphere = Ã,£150+vat each.
Connecting pipe = Ã,£50-100 each.
Refill = Ã,£30-50.

Worst case scenario isnt good.

Bloody rover sh*te
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: brummie on April 21, 2006, 20:41:13 PM
Quote from: sdpbah, just been reading up;

Hydra sphere = Ã,£150+vat each.
Connecting pipe = Ã,£50-100 each.
Refill = Ã,£30-50.

Worst case scenario isnt good.

Bloody rover sh*te


Doubt youll need it all changing though
Gassing up seems to be expensive
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Pete on April 21, 2006, 20:42:21 PM
Im guessing somethings failed - it happened pretty suddenly.
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Madrocker on April 21, 2006, 21:02:12 PM
oh the joy of refilling hydrolastic suspention.
lovely green sh*te, I had to do one of my mates grans metros.

not that hard but still a pain in the arse.
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: DEViANCE on April 21, 2006, 21:11:35 PM
either one of the units has failed or the connecting pipe has broken. front and back are linked one each side. should be pretty easy to see what has failed as the will be juice everywhere.

it is a very, very rare occurance.
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: DEViANCE on April 21, 2006, 21:15:12 PM
where did you get those prices from? i think they are abit off
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Madrocker on April 21, 2006, 21:18:37 PM
Quote from: DEViANCEeither one of the units has failed or the connecting pipe has broken. front and back are linked one each side. should be pretty easy to see what has failed as the will be juice everywhere.

it is a very, very rare occurance.

Id say its the connecting pipe.
Title: Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: maximusotter on April 21, 2006, 21:25:05 PM
Sounds rather odd. Just dealt with struts myself, and though theyre expensive, you can still drive the car when theyre worn.

That Rover sounds a bit dire if you decide to drive into a concrete barrier. :lol:

(http://www.austin-rover.co.uk/images/r100_09.jpg)
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: DEViANCE on April 21, 2006, 21:27:52 PM
lol!!! for some reason sales dried up after that pic was published.

i think the handling more than makes up for though. Took one for its MOT today and giving it the thrashing of its life before was great fun.
Title: Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Binary Shadow on April 21, 2006, 21:31:57 PM
 :shock:  hell that car looks.... well horrifically unsafe lol

what speed was that crash at?
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: DEViANCE on April 21, 2006, 21:32:45 PM
just dont crash into a concrete barrier at 60mph :p
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Binary Shadow on April 21, 2006, 21:33:25 PM
Quote from: DEViANCEjust dont crash into a concrete barrier at 60mph :p
or hit another car at 30mph head on doing 30mph
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: DEViANCE on April 21, 2006, 21:39:12 PM
not really as the other car would absorb alot more energy than the concrete.

http://qstream-down.qbrick.com/00862/ovrigt/0201/m0ov020104rover100.mov

i like the way the airbag actually directs the face into the dash :P
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Pete on April 21, 2006, 21:43:07 PM
QuoteThat Rover sounds a bit dire if you decide to drive into a concrete barrier.

Its a bit dire driving anywhere in one.

Title: Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: redneck on April 21, 2006, 22:01:08 PM
there is more crash safety designed into bins than that car
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Steve W on April 22, 2006, 15:58:46 PM
Back to the topic the suspension fluid pipe valve can fail. This can be bought from a dealer and used to be about Ã,£10. Its nothing more than a modified tyre valve really. Replace the valve, pump back up and jobs a goodun.
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: soopahfly on April 22, 2006, 16:03:03 PM
The handling is shocking!  Devi obviously hasnt driven any half decent cars.

A wooden plank, with shopping trolly wheels has more stability than one of those.
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Madrocker on April 22, 2006, 17:16:04 PM
Quote from: soopahflyThe handling is shocking!  Devi obviously hasnt driven any half decent cars.

A wooden plank, with shopping trolly wheels has more stability than one of those.

lol. I have never actuly driven hard enough to make the car understeer onto the other side of the road.

but I bet it wont handle like your old mini.
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: M3ta7h3ad on April 22, 2006, 18:00:17 PM
Quote from: DEViANCEnot really as the other car would absorb alot more energy than the concrete.

http://qstream-down.qbrick.com/00862/ovrigt/0201/m0ov020104rover100.mov

i like the way the airbag actually directs the face into the dash :P

Rofl!! :D I love it :D Its like... here we place a head guidance system, the thought behind it is... well your f**ked anyway if you have a crash in this car, may as well make your death quicker than it would be otherwise :D
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Mark on April 22, 2006, 19:52:31 PM
The handling on a mini is nothing to write home about either - the hillman imp is a far, far more capable car than a mini
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: brummie on April 22, 2006, 20:14:36 PM
Quote from: BXGTi16VThe handling on a mini is nothing to write home about either - the hillman imp is a far, far more capable car than a mini

minis were good. Could never loose control of a mini.
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: DEViANCE on April 23, 2006, 08:22:39 AM
Quote from: soopahflyThe handling is shocking!  Devi obviously hasnt driven any half decent cars.

A wooden plank, with shopping trolly wheels has more stability than one of those.
no it isnt. even on a bog spec one with no anti roll bars or shocks and 155 tyres the handling is brilliant. i have managed to scare dozens of people in a 1.1 on b roads.
Then the GTa/GTi with front and rear arbs and extra shocks is even better i have out paced lots of much more powerfull cars around a track in a standard GTi.
Title: Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Chris on April 23, 2006, 09:57:33 AM
Quote from: Binary Shadow:shock:  hell that car looks.... well horrifically unsafe lol

what speed was that crash at?

10mph :lol:
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Madrocker on April 23, 2006, 11:14:51 AM
Quote from: BXGTi16VThe handling on a mini is nothing to write home about either - the hillman imp is a far, far more capable car than a mini

hillman are notorious for oversteer so not to sure what you talking bout tbh.

I can throw my mini round a small roundabout @ 45mph without any problems (had a little understeer once with redneck in the car but thats cuz I hit the power to hard)
Title: Re:Rover 100 - suspension
Post by: Pete on April 24, 2006, 14:23:05 PM
I wouldnt mind a go in an Imp.

The 100 I only drove a couple of times and it really wasnt that bad, but the 1.1 isnt nearly enough and makes it a horrible car to drive.


 
(http://www.palmer934.plus.com/bart1.jpg)