Tekforums

Chat => General Discussion => Topic started by: Sam on January 30, 2007, 17:50:44 PM

Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: Sam on January 30, 2007, 17:50:44 PM
Dont ask us how we brought this up, but here in 7soft development studio (ahem) we want to know if you had dodgy pictures of yourself as a kid, is that illegal.
Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: maximusotter on January 30, 2007, 17:53:53 PM
I wanna know if anybody wanks to their own baby pics, and what that would be called in Latin. Or maybe I dont. :unsure:
Title: Re:Interesting paedo question
Post by: Serious on January 30, 2007, 18:18:36 PM
Providing its just nudity then its legal. Otherwise at least half the naturists in the country would be serving time.

Thinking back there was a TV programme on Lewis_Carroll who photographed many young girls. Many of these still exist and, dispite attempts to get the owners to destroy them, are legal.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lewis_Carroll

TBH the law is a mess on this point and its the intent rather than the actual content of a photo that has become the issue.
Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: Binary Shadow on January 30, 2007, 19:33:57 PM
Quote from: SamDont ask us how we brought this up, but here in 7soft development studio (ahem) we want to know if you had dodgy pictures of yourself as a kid, is that illegal.
you have pictures of yourself as a kid performing sexual acts???
Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: maximusotter on January 30, 2007, 19:40:52 PM
His family traveled and performed as "The Aristocrats (http://youtube.com/watch?v=5l_rdSKXji0)"*. :lol:


*warning: filth!
Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: Serious on January 31, 2007, 02:55:30 AM
Quote from: maximusotterHis family traveled and performed as "The Aristocrats"*. :lol:


*warning: filth!

Warning: he aint kidding - Extreme filth so bad I am not opening it just in case!!! :shock:
Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: maximusotter on January 31, 2007, 03:18:24 AM
Oh, sister! (http://blinkynet.net/stuff/penguin3.jpg)
Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: *she-devil* on January 31, 2007, 17:02:46 PM
As long as theyre purely innocent how can they be construed as pornographic?
Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: Smugs on January 31, 2007, 17:12:03 PM
Quote from: Serious
Quote from: maximusotterHis family traveled and performed as "The Aristocrats"*. :lol:


*warning: filth!

Warning: he aint kidding - Extreme filth so bad I am not opening it just in case!!! :shock:

There was a docu-film on Film 4 last year about that joke I couldnt believe the filth some of those comedians were comming out with some well known comedians as well all trying to create the sickest version.

Seriously NSFW and seriously not funny.

Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: maximusotter on January 31, 2007, 17:26:32 PM
^^^Remind me to keep you away from Lenny Bruce and Andy Kaufman.^^^
Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: Serious on January 31, 2007, 18:03:59 PM
Quote from: *she-devil*As long as theyre purely innocent how can they be construed as pornographic?

Very easily, thats why pictures of kids disappeared from many clothing catalogues, the fear that paedos would wank over them...

Its not what you or I think, its what they do.

Quote from: Smugs
Quote from: Serious
Quote from: maximusotterHis family traveled and performed as "The Aristocrats"*. :lol:


*warning: filth!

Warning: he aint kidding - Extreme filth so bad I am not opening it just in case!!! :shock:

There was a docu-film on Film 4 last year about that joke I couldnt believe the filth some of those comedians were comming out with some well known comedians as well all trying to create the sickest version.

Seriously NSFW and seriously not funny.


I tried watching it, got terminally bored half way through and switched off.
Title: Interesting paedo question
Post by: maximusotter on January 31, 2007, 18:18:56 PM
"My brother has downs syndrome..did I say that? People might think its a setback, but really, its a selling point. Its not a handicap, I dont want to say its a gift...well, we think its a gift in terms of ticket sales. I mean, we think of it as showing the other beauties that God creates. Like the ones with the bigger foreheads and the lower eyelids."

:rofl: Classic Silvermann. :D