News:

Tekforums.net - The improved home of Tekforums! :D

Main Menu

PC

Started by Mark, February 02, 2008, 00:18:29 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Mark

Well, another nail in the coffin for common sense

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7222008.stm

What is wrong with people? They cant even have a TV ad that says stupid dog, clever fiesta because some f**king dried up old hag is offended by it.

The media and its paedophilia obsession. When are people going to realise that this is not a new thing, it has been going on since the beginning of time. I am actually afraid to take my young cousins anywhere for fear of being thought of as a paedo. Its f**king ludicrous. There are no more paedophiles than there were 100 years ago, they just get more media exposure nowadays.




Poison_UK

.............

Reminds me of work. Ive got to be so carefull and totally PC, its not the Segregation unit anymore... Its the Separation and Care Unit. PC! f**k PC!

Clock'd 0Ne

This is very pathetic, its a normal girls name, albeit not a very common one. The reference is hardly going to inflect anything on the kids now is it. Paedophiles everywhere arnt going to be flocking to Woolies in the hopes of luring young children to their bedrooms by dressing them up in the new Lolita bedlinnen range.


BigSoy

Im not convinced that this is entirely to do with "Political Correctness" as such, the name does have some connotations which probably are fairly inappropriate for a young girls bed.

Unless of course youre aiming to raise a young Stripper/Hooker/Porn-Star.
"Within your 'purview'? Where do you think you are, some f**king regency costume drama? This is a government department, not some f**king Jane f**king Austen novel!"

Eggtastico

Quote from: MarkWell, another nail in the coffin for common sense

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/7222008.stm

What is wrong with people? They cant even have a TV ad that says stupid dog, clever fiesta because some f**king dried up old hag is offended by it.

The media and its paedophilia obsession. When are people going to realise that this is not a new thing, it has been going on since the beginning of time. I am actually afraid to take my young cousins anywhere for fear of being thought of as a paedo. Its f**king ludicrous. There are no more paedophiles than there were 100 years ago, they just get more media exposure nowadays.




Its like that bloke who got done over because he was a pediatrician. People got it mixed up with peadophile



A paediatrician at a south Wales hospital has been forced out of her home by vandals who thought her job title meant the same as "paedophile".

South African-born Yvette Cloete woke up at her home in Newport to find the term "paedo" spray painted all over her walls.

The specialist registrar at the Royal Gwent Hospital is now in hiding at a friends house and claims she will never go back to her own, saying: "I have moved out of the area. I no longer feel safe."

M3ta7h3ad

Quote from: BigSoyIm not convinced that this is entirely to do with "Political Correctness" as such, the name does have some connotations which probably are fairly inappropriate for a young girls bed.

Unless of course youre aiming to raise a young Stripper/Hooker/Porn-Star.

Agreed, they were right to pull it in this case.

Its not political correctness at all, its decency.

Clock'd 0Ne

Whether you attribute it decency or not, they were still wrong to pull it in this case. So are parents to be banned from naming their children Lolita because it happens to coincide with the name of the book? Where do you draw the line?

Should we remove Glitter from the shelves too while were at it?

M3ta7h3ad

No because noone is banning it, the store has removed it as its in poor taste.

If someone says Lolita to you, most people would instantly think of that book/movie.

Relax crazy paranoid people... we still have free will, you can if you wish call your daughter a name attributed to child sex and promiscuity however most people would think you were an idiot to do so.

Clock'd 0Ne

Yeah, right... so all the Spanish that name their daughter that from the derivative Lola where it originates are idiots?

So if the author had decided the book/character was to named Anne, or Sarah, or some equally common name, all those parents would be idiots too? You wernt one of those that linched the paediatrician were you?

addictweb

This is being blown out of proportion.

It is a little silly for woolworths to call a girls bedding range Lolita - a google search can confirm that it has connotations. There is nothing wrong with Lolita but it would probably harm the sales figures of the range so im sure woolworths are just going to re-brand it.

They were not banned, sued or even asked to remove the line, the mothers forum just asked them for their thought process and if they realised that there might be connotations. After spotting the connotations woolworths THEMSELVES chose to stop selling the stuff.

This isnt news, its just something for people to rabble about.
Formerly sexytw

Rivkid

I think Woolies have got this right to be honest. Its a name thats synonymous with paedophilia regardless of whether its a normal name or not. Just stick it in to any search engine if you want proof. Theres an assosication that exists whether thats right or wrong.

Technically theres nothing wrong with it and it couldnt be banned by any means that would be silly - but in good taste it was a good move.
Career, Wife, Mortgage... my sig was better when it listed guitars and PC's and stuff!

Edd

its not a name that is synonymous with paedos, its a name synonymous with a sexual promiscuous young girl

i think it was a poor choice of name and woolies were right to withdraw the line

Sam

Yes blame the manufacturer for being stupid.

BigSoy

I can just picture the kind of people chastising Woolies for this move being the same people to condem girls getting pregnant at 14 etc and spending a lifetime on benefits.

If you let them sleep in a Lolita bed, wander round in matching "Little Miss Naughty" training bra and pants, and write their homework with a Playboy pencil, what do you expect?

"Within your 'purview'? Where do you think you are, some f**king regency costume drama? This is a government department, not some f**king Jane f**king Austen novel!"

Clock'd 0Ne

Most kids have never read the book anyway, like any of them really understand the connotations involved to even consider it bad taste.

Anyone that thinks a bedspread called Lolita is going to have raving paedophiles at the window or their daughter turning into a jailbait slut are really deluded.

Ive changed my mind though. Theres clearly enough tabloid readers out there to warrant a need to protect themselves by removing it from the shelves - for bad taste.