Is there any evidence that cyclists damage the road to any notable extent? I've always argued the point that they should pay road tax without really knowing why, obviously it's obvious why they really should have to pay insurance but I'm not clear on the road tax issue now that I think about it. Have their been any studies done demonstrating that they actually contribute substantially to wear and tear?
In the United Kingdom owners are required to pay Vehicle Excise Duty, commonly known as "car tax", "vehicle tax" or "road tax", which is paid to the government for a vehicle licence, which must be displayed on most motor vehicles used on public roads.[3]
Since 1937 there has been no direct relationship between the tax and government expenditure on public roads. The registered keeper of a vehicle that is not used or kept on public roads must complete a Statutory Off Road Notification (SORN).[4]
Bikes don't pollute or cause any noticeable wear and tear. There should be a competence test though and some sort of "MOT".
Usually people that haven't got a f**king clue how to ride their bikes are the ones who's bikes are hanging on by a thread.