Tekforums

Chat => General Discussion => Topic started by: Pete on September 27, 2006, 23:10:25 PM

Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Pete on September 27, 2006, 23:10:25 PM
 :?:
Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: knighty on September 27, 2006, 23:28:43 PM
eh ?

dont know what either of them are....
Title: Re:TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Clock'd 0Ne on September 28, 2006, 00:35:29 AM
Times New Roman, Courier New tries too hard.
Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: knighty on September 28, 2006, 00:45:46 AM
ahhhhh

Courier New SUCKS ASS

times new roman rocks

nuf said :P
Title: Re:TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Quixoticish on September 28, 2006, 11:06:45 AM
Courier New rocks, because fixed pitch looks so neat and tidy.

If I recieve anything in Times New Roman I think it looks shoddy, simply because it used to be the default font that everyone used.
Title: Re:TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Beaker on September 28, 2006, 11:15:11 AM
For Screens Verdana 12 point  :thumbup:
Title: Re:TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Mongoose on September 28, 2006, 11:46:37 AM
TNR rocks CNs world

but anything is better than Ariel TBH
Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Leon on September 28, 2006, 12:41:08 PM
Verdana for the win! :P

but since its not an option ill go for CN
Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Binary Shadow on September 28, 2006, 13:47:05 PM
they are both crap Ariel ftw
Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Clock'd 0Ne on September 28, 2006, 13:58:51 PM
Quote from: Binary Shadowthey are both crap Ariel ftw


 :thumbup:
Title: Re:TNR vs Courier New
Post by: M3ta7h3ad on September 28, 2006, 14:39:33 PM
im a fan of helvetica but Tahoma wins out in any contest.

Out of TNR and CN... gotta be TNR, the macdaddy, the original, the one and only one. mmmmmm I love those serifs!
Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Jaimz on September 28, 2006, 14:56:00 PM
For me its all about Trebuchet MS, but TNR is slightly less unattractive than Courier New

Jaimz :rock:
Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: maximusotter on September 28, 2006, 15:10:43 PM
Bitstream Vera (http://www.bitstream.com/font_rendering/products/dev_fonts/vera.html) all the way. Sans for screen reading, and Serif when printed. The Bitstream fonts are blockier than the MS stuff and "glom" the words together better for faster reading.
Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Binary Shadow on September 28, 2006, 15:10:50 PM
oops lol thats ARIAL then
Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: redneck on September 28, 2006, 15:14:58 PM
I do believe you non-typographists realise the weight and style of font is more than just mere personal preference.
Title: Re:TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Serious on September 28, 2006, 16:52:39 PM
Quote from: Chris HCourier New rocks, because fixed pitch looks so neat and tidy.

If I recieve anything in Times New Roman I think it looks shoddy, simply because it used to be the default font that everyone used.

The only people who should be using fixed pitch are programmers and accountants, for books, letters and the like TNR is the better option.
Title: Re:TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Quixoticish on September 28, 2006, 17:01:00 PM
QuoteThe only people who should be using fixed pitch are programmers and accountants, for books, letters and the like TNR is the better option.

I didnt know there was a law about who should use which fonts. I mustnt have recieved that memo.  :roll:
Title: TNR vs Courier New
Post by: maximusotter on September 28, 2006, 17:12:50 PM
(http://static.flickr.com/94/254947093_9ebe9b8df3_o.png)
Title: Re:TNR vs Courier New
Post by: Pete on September 28, 2006, 17:28:39 PM
I heard that Courier new is better because it makes things seem a faster read because its bigger.

It looks ok printed out but not as black as TNR does, and you get a lot less words on the page with CN..