Tekforums

Chat => General Discussion => Topic started by: zpyder on June 18, 2010, 10:56:34 AM

Title: Watches?
Post by: zpyder on June 18, 2010, 10:56:34 AM
Another watch thread :D

Im starting to get an itchy wrist, wanting to get a new watch, even though I got my current one on the grounds of it being a "keeper" that would last years, Ive only had it for 2 years or so.

Tiny bit of background: I used to have a Citizen diving watch, which I loved, it was durable and never got scratched. Analogue/digital. Only down sides were lack of a backlight, and £60 battery replacements.

The battery replacements made me swap to an ecodrive:
(http://www.gosale.com/product_images/4939000/4939767-citizen-eco-drive-mens_medium.jpg)

I quite like the watch, but its not "tough enough". The watch face is flush with the bezel resulting in loads of scratches. Every time I knock it I dread seeing it being shattered (it got shattered the first week I had it, resulting in 4 trips to citizen to get the glass cleaned out).

I finally sold a gold bracelet my grandmother gave me a few years ago, for £450 :D It was hideous and was never going to be worn, but itd be nice to put the money towards something that WILL be worn.

So, any recommendations on the following criteria:

Budget - £450
Solar powered (or at least doesnt need battery changes)
"Tough" (as in not prone to scratching or breaking, a-la G-shock watches.
Stylish (to be my every day watch, I dont have different ones for different occasions)
Backlight (optional, would be nice)
Not HUGE (I have small wrists)
Other features (Being a gadget lover, the more crammed into it the better)

Ive been tempted by this:
(http://www.schmiemann.de/Media/Shop/casio-pro-trek-prw-5000t-7er_a.jpg)
But Im not sure on the grounds of it being big (Ive yet to find one in a shop to see just how big) and the fact its casio. I dont think Ill ever shake the imagery of being back at school and everyone having casio calculators and g-shock watches. So paying between £300 and £450 for a casio watch isnt ideal. Things tempting me is other than the size, it has everything I want, as well as compass, barometer and thermometer!
Title: Watches?
Post by: Mardoni on June 18, 2010, 11:25:54 AM
Ok first up Im not a huge watch person. I own 4 watches but could only tell you where 2 of them are right now and I think only 1 of them works :s

The watch Ive always fancied (over and above the uber expensive obvious ones) is a Seiko Kinetic watch (http://www.seikowatches.com/technology/kinetic/index.html).
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: matt5cott on June 18, 2010, 11:58:29 AM
I have a seiko kinetic from http://www.skywatches.com.sg for 8 years, and wear it every day  :wub:
Title: Watches?
Post by: Sweenster on June 18, 2010, 13:14:40 PM
Seiko Kinetic here as well.

Had it going on 6 years now and love it. Beginning to look a bit worse for wear unfortunately but still looks better than most watches I see on people.
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: zpyder on June 18, 2010, 13:39:26 PM
Care to take some pictures of your watches? Ive not been that drawn to any of the seiko watches Ive seen, bar the ones that are ££££.
Title: Watches?
Post by: Sweenster on June 18, 2010, 14:34:57 PM
From what you have said, mine is nothing like what you want, mine is a brushed alu stylish job rather than a rugged one.
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: Shaun on June 18, 2010, 15:58:37 PM
Another vote for Seiko I have mine since Christmas 2004 and wear it daily, it wasn't a mega expensive model about 300 quid IIRC,  but the glass seems to be a lot more scratch resistant than any other watches I have had, there is a few small scratches on the bezel and the strap is starting to feel a bit loose but that's about it.

(http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k26/bobbins53/watch.jpg)
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: BigSoy on June 18, 2010, 22:32:18 PM
Seiko Titanium for the win tbh.

Everyone Ive ever shown mine to, and compared it to their fat omega, breitling, tag, whatever immediately goes oh, erm, sh*t - actually quite nice to have two arms the same length isnt it.
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: Ceathreamhnan on June 18, 2010, 22:59:33 PM
If you want a watch face that wont get scratched you want one with a proper sapphire crystal face, like my 12 year old seamaster:

(http://www.morssdn.idps.co.uk/images/Seamaster.jpg)

This one is a mid size quartz so its not big and blingy. You might pick one up used for your budget. Its not got any features beyond the deep dive rating and the helium valve :lol:

And yes it needs a bath.
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: zpyder on June 19, 2010, 09:07:05 AM
Ive read that the sapphire crystals may be stronger, but are more brittle? (and more expensive).

If it comes down to having a watch where I can knock it, and shrug it off thinking "Itll only have a scratch, if that" as opposed to stopping dead in my tracks and grimacing as I check to see if Ive crushed the crystal, I think Id take the scratch!

Id never shattered a crystal until my current watch, and its enough to put me off said watch as well as wanting to go more rugged.
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: Ceathreamhnan on June 19, 2010, 12:24:28 PM
Well its basically rock. Mine has been bashed a fair bit, I dont worry about it because it seems not to be fragile. I think the word crystal is misleading ;) If you read up on sapphire at wikipedia youll see how hard it is; certainly not brittle.
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: Shaun on June 20, 2010, 23:46:12 PM
Hehe this thread has prompted me to buy myself a new watch!  Picked up a cheap Seiko Premier Kinetic of Ebay and should be with me Tuesday. :w00t:

Was looking at watch reviews and spotted this: http://ablogtoread.com/watch-reviews/tissot-t-touch-expert-watch-review-the-king-of-quartz/
Looks right up your street with all the gadgets and touch screen, looks a lot better than that Casio you posted a pic of, which looks something a 10 year old designed IMO :P
Title: Watches?
Post by: Serious on June 21, 2010, 03:47:20 AM
Quote from: zpyderIve been tempted by this:

But Im not sure on the grounds of it being big (Ive yet to find one in a shop to see just how big) and the fact its casio. I dont think Ill ever shake the imagery of being back at school and everyone having casio calculators and g-shock watches. So paying between £300 and £450 for a casio watch isnt ideal. Things tempting me is other than the size, it has everything I want, as well as compass, barometer and thermometer!

How about?  :heehaw:  :heehaw:

http://www.amazon.co.uk/Casio-Sport-PRG-40-3VUR-Triple-Sensor/dp/B000HZUW5G/ref=sr_1_42?ie=UTF8&s=watch&qid=1277087972&sr=8-42
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: zpyder on June 21, 2010, 07:42:28 AM
Digital. Cant stand digital displays. Dont mind both, quite like both, but to me theres something about watches needing hour and minutes hands etc!
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: Serious on June 22, 2010, 02:19:39 AM
To be brutally honest I have dropped Casio. I used to wear them constantly but the last one the metallic areas were just sprayed onto plastic and rubbed off very quickly.

Last couple of years Ive used a Xonix, which I liked simply because it added memory storage. Strap finally went and you cant get replacements :( . Ive now bought a Timex T44642PF Expedition Combo Watch.
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: BigSoy on June 22, 2010, 07:32:23 AM
Quote from: SeriousTo be brutally honest I have dropped Casio. I used to wear them constantly but the last one the metallic areas were just sprayed onto plastic and rubbed off very quickly.


Spray-on metal - nice :/
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: zpyder on June 22, 2010, 07:38:52 AM
Of all the cheap end watches Ive had, timex have had the nicest style, but the worst actual quality. Itd need correcting weekly etc. One of them just decided to break after a month or two, and the jeweller wouldt even take a look at it on the grounds of how mass produced and cheap they are.
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: Serious on June 22, 2010, 08:11:05 AM
If it dies within the first year, it goes back - no excuses. If it doesnt keep adequate time, and Ive had a watch like that, it goes back, not fit for purpose. flywheel watches have the excuse that they are adjustable and the issue is inherent, quartz dont have that as an option.

Every recent watch Ive bought/seen keeps adequate time, even digital £1 jobs. The batteries might fail after a year but the watches work so mass production is no excuse.
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: zpyder on June 22, 2010, 16:26:54 PM
Exactly, which is why I doubt Ill never own another Timex again ;)
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: Serious on July 03, 2010, 16:57:04 PM
Problem is the situation with Timex has changed since the days of fully mechanical watches, modern ones are almost inevitably very accurate, no matter who they are made by. So far it seems accurate to well within a second.

Unfortunately their reputation has stuck with some people.
Title: Re:Watches?
Post by: zpyder on July 03, 2010, 17:01:52 PM
Im happy with my casio now, it updates itself every night so Im pretty sure every day its accurate to within milliseconds. The compass seems to be as accurate as my Silva compass, and the barometer seems to be pretty accurate too, just have to wait and see how useful seeing the air pressure trends is.