A few swan photos from the river Stour in Canterbury.
(http://photos.panfantastic.co.uk/getimage/crw/2/5/_mg_5242.jpg?size=600) (http://photos.panfantastic.co.uk/getimage/crw/2/5/_mg_5242.jpg)
(http://photos.panfantastic.co.uk/getimage/crw/2/5/_mg_5226.jpg?size=600) (http://photos.panfantastic.co.uk/getimage/crw/2/5/_mg_5226.jpg)
(http://photos.panfantastic.co.uk/getimage/crw/2/5/_mg_5221.jpg?size=600) (http://photos.panfantastic.co.uk/getimage/crw/2/5/_mg_5221.jpg)
(http://photos.panfantastic.co.uk/getimage/crw/2/5/_mg_5187.jpg?size=600) (http://photos.panfantastic.co.uk/getimage/crw/2/5/_mg_5187.jpg)
The last one looks like a cross between the loch ness monster and a swan to me.
I like 3 & 4
3 - Because it has more movement / life than 1 & 2
4 - Because of the totaly unphotographed (usualy) pose
Swans are pretty, yet evil. If they were big enough, theyd eat you.
& if you kill them you get in a lot of trouble cos they belong to the queen.
4 is good
3 looks like its a hollow plastic swan with a light bulb up its ass :p
Quote from: Alan3 looks like its a hollow plastic swan with a light bulb up its ass :p
Lol, you have an imaginative mind.
Youve got the same problem i have when trying to photo the birds on water. The water looks like oil.